{"id":1140,"date":"2026-08-27T22:22:54","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:22:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=1140"},"modified":"2026-08-27T22:22:54","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:22:54","slug":"aca-guide-operations-terms-and-conditions-requirements","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=1140","title":{"rendered":"Terms and Conditions \u2014 Requirements and eligibility questions"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ACA ACADEMIC DECISION GUIDE \u00b7 APPLICATIONS AND MEMBER OPERATIONS<\/strong><\/p>\n

Terms and Conditions \u2014 Requirements and eligibility questions<\/h1>\n

Academic career decisions are strongest when the candidate separates professional development from the formal decision of a university or public authority. This guide uses that distinction throughout, so the reader can use ACA resources without overstating what membership, publishing support or career guidance legally accomplishes.<\/p>\n<\/header>\n

\n

Start with the destination criteria<\/h2>\n

Requirements for Terms and Conditions can differ by university, country, discipline and career stage. Obtain the current official criteria before assuming that publication numbers, experience years or memberships have a universal value.<\/p>\n

Separate mandatory and strengthening factors<\/h2>\n

Create two lists: items that are explicitly required and items that merely make a dossier stronger. This prevents candidates from spending time on attractive activities that do not address a mandatory gap.<\/p>\n

Ask for clarification when rules are ambiguous<\/h2>\n

If a criterion uses terms such as recognised journal, international experience or significant contribution, ask the target institution how it interprets them rather than relying on assumptions.<\/p>\n

Evidence standard<\/h2>\n

Use primary evidence whenever possible: official degree records, stable publication identifiers, institutional appointment letters, verified teaching records, project documentation and current criteria from the target institution. Unsupported claims or screenshots should not be treated as equivalent to authoritative records.<\/p>\n

A practical preparation method<\/h2>\n

Keep a dated master file containing the CV, degrees, publication list, teaching evidence, service records, research projects, memberships and important correspondence. Version control matters because academic dossiers often evolve over months or years.<\/p>\n

Institutional and legal boundary<\/h2>\n

Where an academic title or promotion is regulated, the competent university or public authority decides. ACA support can help a candidate prepare a stronger and more accurate file, but it should never be represented as a substitute for the institution\u2019s own appointment procedure.<\/p>\n

Questions to verify independently<\/h2>\n