{"id":281,"date":"2026-08-27T22:21:38","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:21:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=281"},"modified":"2026-08-27T22:21:38","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:21:38","slug":"aca-guide-career-academic-career-audit-documents","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=281","title":{"rendered":"Academic Career Audit \u2014 Documents and evidence to prepare"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ACA ACADEMIC DECISION GUIDE \u00b7 ACADEMIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

Academic Career Audit \u2014 Documents and evidence to prepare<\/h1>\n

Academic progress is rarely produced by one certificate, one publication count or one membership. It is normally the result of a coherent portfolio built over time. The purpose of this guide is to turn a broad goal into verifiable steps, documentary evidence and institution-specific questions.<\/p>\n<\/header>\n

\n

Build a verifiable document set<\/h2>\n

For Academic Career Audit, prepare the records that directly support education, research, teaching, service and professional roles. Use complete documents with stable identifiers and dates.<\/p>\n

Keep descriptions accurate<\/h2>\n

A membership certificate should be described as membership; a support letter as support; an appointment letter as an appointment only when issued by the authorised institution. Avoid changing the meaning of a document through presentation.<\/p>\n

Create a dossier index<\/h2>\n

Number files and maintain a one-page index showing document name, issuer, date and purpose. This makes institutional review easier and helps identify missing evidence early.<\/p>\n

Evidence standard<\/h2>\n

Use primary evidence whenever possible: official degree records, stable publication identifiers, institutional appointment letters, verified teaching records, project documentation and current criteria from the target institution. Unsupported claims or screenshots should not be treated as equivalent to authoritative records.<\/p>\n

A practical preparation method<\/h2>\n

First define the destination: a specific university, country, promotion system, research objective or professional goal. Second, obtain the current written criteria. Third, compare those criteria with the evidence already available. Fourth, identify gaps. Fifth, build a realistic schedule for research, writing, teaching evidence, networking or documentation.<\/p>\n

Institutional and legal boundary<\/h2>\n

ACA is an academic network and support environment. Its guidance, membership, publication assistance, visibility services and dossier support do not by themselves create a university appointment, confer a state-regulated academic title or bind a ministry, university senate, promotion committee or external evaluator.<\/p>\n

Questions to verify independently<\/h2>\n