{"id":622,"date":"2026-08-27T22:22:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:22:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=622"},"modified":"2026-08-27T22:22:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T22:22:09","slug":"aca-guide-visibility-institutional-repositories-process","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/aca.edu.ge\/?page_id=622","title":{"rendered":"Institutional Repositories \u2014 Step-by-step preparation process"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

ACA ACADEMIC DECISION GUIDE \u00b7 ACADEMIC VISIBILITY<\/strong><\/p>\n

Institutional Repositories \u2014 Step-by-step preparation process<\/h1>\n

Academic career decisions are strongest when the candidate separates professional development from the formal decision of a university or public authority. This guide uses that distinction throughout, so the reader can use ACA resources without overstating what membership, publishing support or career guidance legally accomplishes.<\/p>\n<\/header>\n

\n

Define the objective<\/h2>\n

Write the intended outcome for Institutional Repositories in one sentence and identify the authority that will decide it.<\/p>\n

Audit the current profile<\/h2>\n

Compare qualifications, publications, teaching, service, research and visibility with the stated goal. Record gaps honestly.<\/p>\n

Execute in stages<\/h2>\n

Prioritise mandatory gaps first, then strengthen the profile through research quality, documentation, networking and communication. Review progress at regular milestones.<\/p>\n

Evidence standard<\/h2>\n

Quality is not merely quantity. Ten strong, relevant and well-documented contributions can be more useful than a larger list that does not satisfy the target institution\u2019s rules. Candidates should therefore map evidence to criteria instead of assuming that one universal threshold exists.<\/p>\n

A practical preparation method<\/h2>\n

Turn the goal into a matrix with four columns: requirement, existing evidence, gap, and next action. This simple method prevents vague career planning and makes it easier to decide which ACA service, publication project or networking activity is actually relevant.<\/p>\n

Institutional and legal boundary<\/h2>\n

ACA is an academic network and support environment. Its guidance, membership, publication assistance, visibility services and dossier support do not by themselves create a university appointment, confer a state-regulated academic title or bind a ministry, university senate, promotion committee or external evaluator.<\/p>\n

Questions to verify independently<\/h2>\n